Archive for category opinion
by cj world news us
Putin claims to have all these advanced super weapons; the cruise missile with a nuclear engine, as well as the publicly known RS-28 Sarmatinter continental ballistic missile (ICBM), the previously unacknowledged nuclear-tipped Avangard hyper-sonic boost-glide vehicle and Kanyon or Status-6 nuclear-armed unmanned undersea vehicle, a possibly dual-purpose nuclear and conventional air-launched hyper-sonic cruise missile called Kinzhal, and a short-range directed-energy system visually similar to the U.S. Navy’s own AN/SEQ-3 Laser Weapon System. Putin also claims he is building the most advanced aircraft carrier, a new advanced submarine, new advanced stealth fighters and bombers, the most advanced tanks, the S-300, S-400, S-500, S-600 and S-700 missile defense system, Putin claims the S700 could shut down all air traffic in the world.
Russia’s economy can’t sustain the development of these various advanced weapon systems, Putin’s ambitious military plans will take 25 years or more. He faces continued sanctions, the global price of oil already forced the country to make significant cuts to defense spending in 2017. The fact is that Russia spends 60-70 billion a year on it’s defense budget and it is estimated that it would cost 5 trillion dollars to research, build, maintain and deploy all of these weapon systems.
Putin recently stated in reference to all his super weapons “It’s not a bluff, you can trust me.” It remains to be seen just how far Russia proceeds with the various projects. It’s reasonable to be more than skeptical that Russia has the resources, knowledge, advancements, money and ability to follow through with its plans. Russia used to be secretive about it’s military advancements and weapons but now they reveal everything on a regular basis. Putin should definitely be credited for his “gift of gab” and acting abilities, maybe he’s in the wrong line of work. Seriously look at the man and study his past, should anyone trust him or anything he says?
It often happens that, despite a person’s being provided with good reasons to change her evaluative beliefs, she chooses not to do so. This event is recurrent in Plato’s dialogues, where Socrates is often depicted using reason and argument to try to convert his interlocutors to the life of philosophy, but where, just as often, his interlocutors are depicted as highly resistant. In my research, I investigate the implications of this for Platonic moral psychology and the task of moral education; and how, if at all, Plato thinks that such resistance can be overcome.
A central issue here—whether a person can rationally decide to become a new person—is one in which there has been a resurgence of interest lately in contemporary philosophy. Decision theorists such as L.A. Paul (2014) argue that, since one’s evaluative preferences radically change after becoming a new person, one’s current evaluative preferences can provide little, if any, guidance about whether to do so. In contrast, Agnes Callard (2018) argues that one can rationally choose to become a new person. On her view, transformation is the result of aspiration, an active process of coming to see clearly a value that at first one merely glimpses. What about for Plato? Answering this is important not only for giving historical depth to a contemporary issue of significant philosophical interest. It is important also for solving a longstanding problem of Platonic scholarship: why does Socrates, despite often wielding arguments that his interlocutors cannot refute, have so little success in convincing them to change their ways of life? Does Plato think that Socrates’ project of philosophical conversion is a lost cause—that reason is wholly ineffective at motivating someone to adopt new values?
On a widely held and highly influential view, that is precisely what Plato thinks. More specifically, scholars tend to hold that, for Plato, (i) reason alone is ineffective at improving people, in part because (ii) reason is incapable of overcoming the influence that one’s desires can have on one’s evaluative beliefs, and so (iii) Socrates’ project of philosophical conversion, in virtue of relying on reason to change a person’s evaluative beliefs, is tactically flawed.
This view on the relationship between Socrates’ project of conversion and Plato’s moral psychology has been predominant for the last several decades (in fact, it can be seen as tracing back to Nietzsche). Further, it provides a reason to suppose that there is a deep divide between Socrates and Plato: while Socrates thought that reason alone could reform a person’s values, Plato thought nothing of the sort. However, I think that it results from a profound misreading of Plato’s corpus. Most of my research aims at correcting that reading and, in its place, providing a full account of Socrates’ project of conversion, one that shows it not to be inconsistent with Plato’s moral psychology but rather, properly conceived, to be deeply informed by it.
What follows are abstracts of the papers that are my current focus.
* Ancient Greek & Roman Philosophy *
[Name Withheld to Preserve Blind Review] In this paper, I defend the viability of Socrates’ project of philosophical conversion against widespread scholarly skepticism. I argue that, for Plato, philosophical argument can be effective at causing a person to come to value wisdom the most, but not primarily in the way that one might expect—that is, not primarily by prompting someone to draw the conclusion that she must change her way of life, but rather by its causing her to have a non-rational experience, one that can be effective at reshaping her beliefs about how best to live.
[Name Withheld to Preserve Blind Review] In this paper, I consider the significance of Socrates’ remark in the Gorgias that it is Callicles’ eros that is the cause of his being unpersuaded to change his way of life. I argue that, far from a mere literary embellishment, Socrates’ remark points us to an often overlooked but highly important part of Plato’s moral psychology, in particular Plato’s conception of hot cognition. I then distinguish two kinds of eros for Plato—roughly, eros for pleasure, and eros for the good (alternatively phrased as appearance-based eros and reflection-based eros)—and I show that each kind causes a different type of hot cognition: the first a process of wishful thinking (i.e., holding a belief regardless of the evidence), the second a process of motivated reasoning (i.e., holding a belief based on evidence, but evidence that, due to one’s desire to hold the belief, one evaluates in self-serving ways). I argue that only motivated reasoning is a serious problem for Socrates’ project of using reason and argument to change his interlocutors belies about how best to live—and that, at the end of the day, this is good news: it means that Socrates can be successful.
[Name Withheld to Preserve Blind Review] In this paper, I argue for a Socratic method that is distinct in kind from refutation, unified by formal features, and far more effective at converting Socrates’ interlocutors to the life of philosophy than refutation is ever shown to be. I call it “Socratic exhortation.” I show that it is foremost an exercise in practical reason, one that consists of three stages: Socrates identifies the object of his interlocutor’s strongest desire (in particular, the object of his interlocutor’s eros); he then convinces the interlocutor that his current way of trying to satisfy that desire is ineffective; and, finally, he persuades the interlocutor that, to satisfy it, he must gain wisdom, and thus must do philosophy.
[Name Withheld to Preserve Blind Review] Is there a uniquely Platonic form of protreptic? Most scholars doubt it. In this paper, I argue that, on the contrary, there is a form of protreptic in Plato that is distinctive, and, further, that it is put into practice by Socrates’ exercise of his “erotic art.”
The Importance for Plato of What People Care About. In this paper, I analyze the notion of caring about or valuing (epimeleisthai) in Plato. One might think that, to count as valuing something, one needs only to believe that it is important. However, using texts from playwrights, rhetoricians, and philosophers of Classical Greece, I show that epimeleisthai was understood as requiring more: not only believing something is important, but, as a result, acting on behalf of it and attending to it. I then argue that Plato revises the notion so that it requires also having knowledge about what one purports to epimeleisthai, a requirement to which Socrates consistently appeals in refuting his interlocutors’ claims to care about things rightly.
Socratic Refutation and Epistemic Duties. In this paper, I consider why Socrates (or anyone else) would believe that refutation would be conducive to changing a person’s fundamental values in the first place. I argue that existing accounts fail to give a plausible explanation, and I provide a novel account that fares better. On my account, what Socrates refutes is an interlocutor’s claim to have fulfilled his role-based epistemic duty, i.e., a duty to know imparted by his social role, to know in particular what is required to perform that social role well. In doing so, he motivates them to do philosophy as a way of repairing their social status and self-esteem.
* Outside of Ancient Greek & Roman Philosophy *
Loving Animals and Eating Meat. One of the most promising alternatives to utilitarian-based and deontology-based thinking about animal welfare is found in Cora Diamond’s paper, “Eating Meat and Eating People,” where she argues that our tendency to view animals as fellow creatures is, in some significant sense, inconsistent with our tendency to use them as objects, e.g., to exploit their labor or raise them on factory farms. It is not obvious, however, why we should care about this inconsistency. In this paper, I supplement Diamond’s view with an argument for why this inconsistency should bother us—not because it is a mere inconsistency, I argue, but rather because in many cases it is a sign of willful moral blindness, and thus shows us to be self-deceivers.
Beauty and Aesthetic Merit: Two Currencies of Aesthetic Judgment. In this paper, I offer a solution to the longstanding tension in aesthetics between the theses that there are no principles of aesthetic judgment (popularly phrased as ‘beauty is in the eye of the beholder’) and that aesthetic judgments are genuine in the sense of being about objects in the external world. If that were true, then, contrary to the first thesis, we would expect there to be some principles that determine whether an aesthetic judgment is true or false; but that would conflict with the first thesis. I argue that both theses are equally plausible, and that the tension arises only if we cash out aesthetic value in one currency. In fact, I argue, there is ample reason to think that aesthetic value comes in two forms—aesthetic merit and beauty—and that, if we allow for this, the tension is resolved.
I’m a Lecturer in the Philosophy Department at the University of Toronto and affiliated with its Collaborative Program in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. I work on Ancient Greek & Roman Philosophy and Ethics.
In November 2017, I received my PhD from the University of Toronto, writing under the supervision of Rachel Barney, with Brad Inwood, James Allen, and Tom Hurka as readers. During my time in the PhD program I held a Connaught International Scholarship for doctoral work.
I did my undergraduate degree at Wabash College, a liberal arts college in Indiana, and before that I taught English in northern China.
You can find my CV here.
In my spare time, I like to return to what I first thought doing philosophy was, reading novels and poetry and watching films.
Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto
170 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5R2M8
cj world news us
PS Just found it interesting
Excerpt: ‘CNN News’: story by Julia Horowitz, On China and US trade.
In recent months, Beijing has shown a willingness to make concessions. It’s lowering tariffs on auto imports. It’s opening its financial markets to foreign lenders. And it will start allowing US automakers to make cars in the country without local business partners.
But as notable as those changes are, China is standing firm on big issues. It’s plowing ahead with its plan to dominate tech, including artificial intelligence. At the same time, China is pumping hundreds of billions of dollars into infrastructure projects in Asia, Africa and Europe — buying years of goodwill and geopolitical influence.
Trump, meanwhile, focuses on the trade deficit. But economists say that fixation is misplaced. China will continue to be a giant producer on the global stage, while the US economy is driven by consumer spending. Read More
Cj World News US
The elimination of dangerous substances out of the whole body is known as body cleansing or detoxification. People who don’t clear their own body from toxic substances are more likely to gain weight and in addition fall prey to various illnesses. Body cleansing, whenever carried out at least once or two times every three months, will add a large amount of energy to your life and may help keep you in good shape and cheerful. For everybody who is wondering the right way to go through body cleansing, then this following information may help you in cleansing your entire body successfully.
Drink plenty of water: This really is one of the easiest in addition to beneficial methods for detoxification. For everybody who is scared of taking herbs which guarantee an effective body cleanse then this particular one is available for you. Drinking at the very least 8-10 cups of drinking water per day can serve as the best detoxifier. This is primarily because; water increases your metabolic rate and helps in flushing out all of the harmful toxins from the entire body by means of urine or excreta.
Stick to a Liver Detoxification Diet: The liver within our body detoxifies toxic compounds and breaks down worn-out erythrocytes (older blood cells that contain hemoglobin) therefore it is very important that you preserve it adequately. One method to accomplish this is simply by following a liver detoxification diet. In this diet, it is advisable to stick to a diet plan consisting mostly of liquids like lemon juice and other liquids. However, while carrying out a liver detoxification diet, you must totally stay away from eating junk and fatty food items. It is because; avoiding these kinds of foods will assist you to prepare your body for the liver detoxification diet as well as help you to take advantage of the liver detoxification diet.
Undertake a colon detox: The colon is one of the most vital bodily organs within the human body as it flushes out toxins from the body. While flushing out the toxins, a number of them adhere to the colon and have an effect on its functioning. Therefore, if you need to cleanse your whole body, then a basic colon detox can also help. The simplest way to go through a colon detox is to go through it with the support of a doctor. Another easy technique through which you could have a colon cleanse is simply by drinking lots of water.
Adhere to a healthy diet: Nothing works better than following a proper diet composed of all-natural foods while body cleansing. When you genuinely wish to purify your entire body then you will need to include foods like fruits and green and leafy veggies into your diet. This is mainly because; fruits and veggies tend to be rich in fiber, which supports in food digestion so therefore, assists with purifying your entire body. Also, you should keep away from oily and packaged foods as they quite simply have a large amount of fats which in turn cause harm to your entire body.
One essential thing to remember while body cleansing is that you should not overdo it. If you do you’ll have to face the consequences as you will end up doing the opposite of what you need to achieve. Don’t forget, body cleansing isn’t a thing which you have to do every day. This is a thing that ought to be done at least one time or two times every 3 months to lead a healthy, toxin-free and cheerful life. Consequently, what exactly are you waiting around for, if you have never completed a body cleansing, it’s the time now to do it. Don’t fail to remember to see your doctor or your health and fitness trainer prior to considering body detoxification as their direction would definitely aid you in achieving the desired result.
World News US
Americans are outraged to be treated like cattle and subjected to humiliation by airport security screeners of the TSA. Many see these TSA employees as nothing more than glorified security guards who feel it is their right to treat people poorly. Without making any judgments about that aspect, I would like to discuss this topic with you for a moment.
You see, there was an interesting article in Homeland Security Newswire recently on November 22, 2010 titled; “TSA to Make Airport Screenings Minimally Invasive” in which the Transportation Security Administration was countering the onslaught of anger from the American People over the electronic strip searchers and too close for comfort pat downs. One line of this article was rather mystifying to me;
“Although he gave no indication that screening changes were imminent; still, he pointed to the alleged attempt by a Nigerian with explosives in his underwear to try to bring down an Amsterdam-to-Detroit flight last Christmas. “We all wish we lived in a world where security procedures at airports weren’t necessary,” Pistole said, “but that just isn’t the case”
The problem with that excuse for these programs, which in essence take away our dignity, liberty, and freedoms guaranteed to us in the Constitution, is that the “Christmas Bomber” in my opinion was a staged event, perhaps by some rogue groups within the intelligence community wishing to assist in getting the contract for these electronic screeners with the TSA or spreading fear amongst the American People to keep their game going.
Some say we should let the airlines deal with it and take the government out of the picture. In fact, there was an interesting feature on this recently on November 22, 2010 titled; “Privatize Airport Security” segment on “Power Lunch” on CNBC. However, one guest suggested “it wouldn’t change anything as you are still going to put momma through that radiation machine like a cheap frozen entre.”
Apparently, folks are upset and even the President and Congress has been asked to intervene, as lots of statements and chatter are flying around with accusations, and somewhere, Al Qaeda is probably laughing at us. As in reality we are letting the terrorists win this round. Please consider all this.
Contributing article by Lance Winslow
World News US